Follow
Ashish K Mishra
Counter intuitive motor head with a fancy for old cars, green tech and clean fingers

Four years in the making and still nothing: The Apollo-Cooper Tire mess

(Photo: Amit Verma)

Neeraj Kanwar, vice chairman and managing director of Apollo Tyres really put everything he had in chasing Cooper (Photo: Amit Verma)

Earlier yesterday, Cooper Tire & Rubber Co announced that it has terminated its sale to Apollo Tyres, India’s second largest tyre manufacturer.

“It is time to move our business forward,” said Roy Armes, Cooper’s CEO in a statement issued by the company. While the strategic rationale for a business combination with Apollo is compelling, it is clear that the merger agreement both companies signed on June 12 will not be consummated by Apollo and we have been notified that financing for the transaction is no longer available. The right thing for Cooper now is to focus on continuing to build our business,” he added.

Apollo Tyres in a statement said that it was ‘disappointed’. “Apollo is disappointed that Cooper has prematurely attempted to terminate our Merger Agreement.  While Cooper’s lack of control over its largest subsidiary and inability to meet its legal and contractual financial reporting obligations has considerably complicated the situation, Apollo has made exhaustive efforts to find a sensible way forward over the last several months, however, Cooper has been unwilling to work constructively to complete a transaction that would have created value for both companies and their shareholders. Cooper’s actions leave Apollo no choice but to pursue legal remedies for Cooper’s detrimental conduct.”

Now, it would be fair to say that Neeraj Kanwar, vice chairman and managing director of Apollo Tyres really put everything he had in chasing Cooper. It would have been a prized acquisition, a proof of his globalization strategy, but alas it has amounted to nothing. It was sometime in 2009 that Kanwar first approached Cooper Tire, the Ohio based manufacturer for an acquisition. They met, discussed and negotiated. The discussions and negotiations lasted almost three years before the deal was formally announced in June 2013. And almost as soon as it was announced, it got into trouble.

First Apollo’s share price tanked. Investors felt the company was taking on too much debt. The Kanwars had seen this coming so they held a long press conference to allay all fears. A few days later, workers at Cooper’s joint venture plant in China went on a strike. They didn’t want an Indian company to take over. Cooper’s joint venture partner Che Hongzi, a local businessman is believed to be behind this agitation. Soon the factory stopped producing Cooper branded tyres. Kanwar traveled to China to meet Hongzi but it didn’t materialize into anything.

If that wasn’t trouble enough, back in the US, the United Steelworkers, the workers Union at Cooper’s plants in Ohio and Texas, began agitations for a new wage agreement. Once the matter was in arbitration, it was a deal breaker. Thanks to the number of surprises, Apollo wanted to re-negotiate and bring down the $35 a share price it was willing to pay earlier. Cooper sued Apollo for trying to delay the deal. And it has been a downhill ever since. For a company with a fair degree of experience in cross border transaction, Apollo should have known better. And it is quite strange that almost everything that’s transpired in the last six months or so has taken the company by surprise.

What happens now? More litigation. Over damages. The question now may boil down to who has actually called off the deal first. If it is Cooper, then Apollo can claim $50 million. If, on the other hand, it is Apollo, then Cooper stands to gain $112 million. Watch this space.

Post Your Comment
Name
Required
Email
Required, will not be published
Comment
All comments are moderated
 

Comment
The story just reports what is known. This has been one tricky deal for everyone involved and this report has not even got a spec of it. There would have been allegations going back and forth among the three parties involved - where is it? This post is merely a bad summary of perhaps one of the most scintillating deals in recent times.
 
 
Ashish K Mishra
Former senior principal correspondent at Forbes (India). Since 2008, I have been writing on corporate strategy in the automobiles, clean technology and supply chain space. Before I got onto this assignment, I was part of the team that covered feature articles at The Economic Times. I actually started out as a trainee journalist on the ET desk in 2006. I graduated in commerce from Shri Ram College of Commerce in New Delhi and now live in Mumbai.

I love automobiles and spend hours reading up on them and then devote painfully long hours to work on old cars that attract my fancy. Right now I own four cars (my colleagues call them fancy, junk or whatever) and a bicycle which outside my work hours get most of my attention.
 
 
 
Most Popular
Ashish K Mishra's Activity Feed
January 13, 2014 14:08 pm by Anuj Sharma
The story just reports what is known. This has been one tricky deal for everyone involved and this report has not even got a spec of it. There would have been allegations going back and forth among the three parties involved - where is it? This post is merely a bad summary of perhaps one of the most...