Follow
Samar Srivastava
Samar Srivastava
Retail, consumer goods and real estate are what keep me busy.
 Nitin Paranjpe, CEO, HUL  (Photo: Vikas Khot)

Nitin Paranjpe, CEO, HUL (Photo: Vikas Khot)

Hindustan Unilever Ltd, the country’s largest consumer products company, announced a strong set of quarterly numbers. It also gets a new chief executive as Nitin Paranjpe, who led the company for five years and, as many would argue, put it firmly on the growth path, moves on to Unilever as president of its home care business. Paranjpe will be replaced by Sanjiv Mehta, who heads the company’s Middle East and North Africa business.

The results come at a time when growth in consumer products businesses has slowed down over the last three quarters as consumers cut back on both day-to-day as well as discretionary spends. ITC, which reported a disappointing set of numbers on July 25, showed clearly that growth in consumer markets is not always a secular trend. Its cigarette volume is likely to decline by 1-2 percent, according to analyst estimates.

Sales for the quarter grew at 7 percent to Rs 6,809 crore but volume growth—a number that is as keenly tracked—was up just 4 percent for the quarter. Net profit was down 23 percent to Rs 1,019 crore but that number is not strictly comparable as last year the company recorded an exceptional gain due to the sale of its Gulita training centre.

HUL maintained that it sees itself growing faster than its peers but also cautioned that growth rates could dip further. “Between early 2012 and now, there has been a significant slowdown,” said chief executive, Nitin Paranjpe. “And this is across both urban and rural.”

Significantly, for HUL, margins expanded by 70 basis points to 15.2 percent. This came at a time when the company was forced to spend Rs 70 crore more on advertising and promotion to defend its brands in the marketplace. While the company said it had not seen any mass downtrading of brands, it did admit that one brand in particular, Fair and Lovely, had declined, which pulled down growth in the personal products category as a whole.

HUL’s stock price, which has moved like a rocket in the last month, corrected 3.5 percent to Rs 662 but that decline could be attributed as much to the huge run-up as to slowing sales growth. The stock is up 10.3 percent since June 4 when Unilever’s open offer at Rs 600 a share concluded. Its stock has been the second-best performing on the Sensex this year after Sun Pharma.

 

(Photo: Amit Verma)

Raj Jain, former CEO, Walmart India (Photo: Amit Verma)

Walmart India’s fledgling operations have suffered another setback. Raj Jain, the man credited with helping set up the business in India has left the company.

Replacing Jain is Ramnik Narsey, senior vice president at Walmart International. His appointment is interim the company said. Narsey joined the company in May after having served as chairman and chief executive officer at Woolworth India. In a statement issued on Wednesday Walmart did not assign any reasons for the change. Jain could not be reached for comment on his cellphone.

The news also comes at a time when India’s decision to allow foreign investment in multi-brand retail has been a non-starter. No foreign company has agreed to invest in accordance with the new policy partly due to onerous conditions and partly due to continued political opposition. One condition requires states to approve changes and so far all non-Congress ruled states and Kerala have resisted ratifying the policy. Further spooking retailers has been India’s main opposition party, the BJP has publicly stated that it will roll back the notification if it comes to power.

Walmart’s sudden shift comes as the company has been struggling to expand in India. In the last year its pace of expansion has slowed as it shakes off allegations that it used less-than-legal methods to expand in India. Last year it set up five stores as compared to a target of 22 stores. It has not opened any new stores in India in 2013.

Walmart’s woes mirror those of other foreign retailers who have found it hard to expand in India. While high rentals and the lack of backend infrastructure hinder all retailers foreign companies have realized that securing the right permissions to open a store requires oodles of patience. Those wanting to short circuit the process engage contractors to manage the plethora of government agencies that hand out permissions – something Walmart also did.

Last November, Walmart had announced that it was investigating violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act at its subsidiaries in India, China and Mexico. The company had said that it was fully committed to competing the investigation swiftly. As part of the investigation the company had suspended its CFO and the entire legal team, the Economic Times had reported in November.

While the company did not link Jain’s departure to the FCPA investigation people with direct knowledge of the situation said that his departure was due to the investigation. It is unclear whether any more people were let go along with Jain.

In choosing a former chief executive of Woolworths in India Walmart has tacitly acknowledged that it needed someone with India experience to run a joint venture that faces a “series of complexities on an almost daily basis,” said an insider. Narsey’s main challenge will be to put systems and processes in place to ensure this doesn’t happen again. Additionally he’ll have to get store opening back on track otherwise Walmart risks falling behind rivals Carrefour and Metro. And lastly, he’ll have to prepare the groundwork for his successor.

Manu Anand’s departure comes amid speculation that he had been asked to leave(Photo: Amit Verma)

Anand’s departure comes amid speculation that he had been asked to
leave (Photo: Amit Verma)

Manu Anand, chief executive of Pepsico’s Indian operations has quit
the company somewhat abruptly. Anand who had spent 19 years in the
company will be leaving with immediate effect according to a company
statement.

Pepsico India is yet to announce a successor. In the interim, Gautham
Mukkavilli, who heads the beverage division and Praveen Someshwar, who
heads the foods business will report to Saad Abdul-Latif. He heads
Pepsico Asia, Middle East and Africa.

Anand’s departure comes amid speculation that he had been asked to
leave. An internal employee who spoke with Forbes India said that
operationally the company had been losing ground to competitor Coca
Cola in the last few months. Anand’s bet to pay Rs160 crore for the
IPL doesn’t seem to have paid off. According to recent Nielsen numbers
the company has lost ground to Coca Cola. Pepsico’s market share fell
to 29.7 percent from 32.1 percent, the Economic Times reported.

Another reason cited is Anand’s inability to retain his senior team.
Last April, Varun Berry, who was head of the foods business left the
company. He has since been appointed COO at Britannia. Another
prominent departure was that of Geetu Verma, who joined Hindustan
Unilever as executive director foods. In addition to this there have
been several departures at the general manager level, a fact that
didn’t go unnoticed in Pepsico headquarters.

Insiders say what really did, Anand in was his inability to get Ravi
Jaipuria, Pepsico India’s largest bottler on board with some of the
company’s long-term plans. “This lack of alignment really hurt the
company,” he said. According to him Jaipuria had in the last few
months been taking his grievances directly to Indra Nooyi, Pepsico’s
global CEO. He cited the company’s lack of robust defence to Coca
Cola’s Rs.8 per bottle price. That really hurt the company and result
in some loss in market share.

For the moment it’s unclear what the global parent will do. A Pepsico
India spokesperson denied that Anand had been asked to leave or that
his departure had anything to do with performance. A short statement
released by the company said Anand was leaving for a new job. The
company declined to comment on why the handover wasn’t done more
smoothly. Anand was unavailable for comment.

Recent news on Ranbaxy has prominently featured the role of Dinesh Thakur, a whistleblower. Thakur, who worked at Ranbaxy for four months was responsible for blowing the lid on the company ‘s falsification of certification documents submitted to drug controllers around the world. The fraud took place over years and top management was complicit.

While Thakur, received $48.6 million (Rs262.4 crore) for his efforts the case leads to an important question: Why are there such few instances of whistle blowing in India? Is there something in our legal system that makes it harder for whistleblowers? Does the law not accord them the protection they deserve? Or is it just that they don’t have faith that their claims will be heard?

The answer lies in all three. First, the Companies Act does not contain a provision that makes it mandatory for companies to have whistle blowing policies in India. According to a lawyer who has worked in this area all his clients have been multinationals companies. Indian companies don’t show any desire to have a whistle blowing policy in place. “I suspect they don’t know how to handle such cases,” he says.

With multinationals he says there are clear rules on how the case has to be handled, how many levels the matter has to be escalate and what is to be done with the employee for the duration of the investigation. Plus he adds over the years they have worked to show that each case will be looked into fairly. Even then our research shows that it is most often former employees who resort to ratting on their employers. Few have the faith to complain while they are still working. Indian companies are far behind on this one.

In India there have been innumerable instances of whistle blowers being killed. So it’s hardly a surprise that such few people come forward with instances of wrong doing. According to a story on salon.com some 150 whistle blowers were have been harassed or jailed while 20 have been killed. What’s important to note is that whistle blowers exposing government corruption face a particularly uphill task in India. Their cases often wind slowly up the judicial chain and are only resolved decades later.

According to Rabindra Jhunjhunwala, a partner at Khaitan and Co. the lack of whistle blowing has to do with the evolution of corporate law in the country. He says that eight years ago there was a move by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to insert a provision in the Companies Act to enable whistle blowing. It never saw the light of day and has not been heard of since.

So what can companies do? Lawyers and ombudsman point to three measures. First, legislate so that whistle blowing has a sound legal basis. Two, companies must ensure that those who come forward are not persecuted and the matters are investigated promptly. Similarly, the government must also set up mechanisms to ensure speedy disposal of claims. (If they could set up information officers under the Right to Information Act they can do the same in this case as well.) And, lastly companies must ensure that whistle blowers aren’t persecuted.

Some prominent whistle blowing cases:

Nisha Yadav – Jan 2013 – won Godfrey Phillips Bravery Award for lifting lid on child abuse racket at NGO orphanage “Suparaana Ka Aangan”

Kunal Saha – August 2009 – wins Supreme Court case against Advanced Medicare Research Institute in Kolkata for negligent treatment of his wife.

Paul Blakeslee – March 2013 – won $3.4 million for wrongful termination after he blew whistle on a colleague overcharging the government.

Vijay Pandhare – Oct 2012 – Uncovered Maharashtra Irrigation scam. Led to Ajit Pawar’s sacking.

Seema S Bhat – Nov 2005 – Wins Rs. 2.25 crore after exposing excessive levels of lead in water in Washington D.C.

Manoranjan Kumar – Mar 2009 – IES officer wins Rs. 25,000 case against Shipping Ministry for Kandla Port scam

Within days of being appointed law minister Kapil Sibal has cleared an important piece of investor-friendly legislation. He’s legalized the use of put and call options in contracts. The move is likely to make doing business in India a lot easier for companies and investors alike who’d made use of these options.

Simply put, a call option is an agreement whereby one party agrees to buy securities at a predetermined price at a future date while a put option is where a party agrees to sell securities at a predetermined price at a future date.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India, which regulates Indian capital markets had long maintained that these options run contrary to Securities Contract (Regulations) Act. Its main bone of contention was that any contract that is not a spot contract i.e. where the delivery of shares takes place beyond the day on which the contract was made is a speculative contract. The SCRA prohibits such contracts.

Over the years investors and private equity players have used put and call options while structuring deals. “We use it primarily to safeguard our interests. This is something that is a globally accepted practice and not being able to use it in India has been frustrating for us,” said a principal with a private equity firm. He declined to be named as he is not allowed to speak to the media.

There had been a number of deals that had run afoul of this rule.. Take for instance the recent case of Diageo plc’s share purchase agreement of United Spirits Ltd. which contained a put option. It had to be removed before SEBI granted its clearance. SEBI had also rejected its use in the Cairn Vedanta deal in 2010.

Further adding to the issue was the fact that the Companies Act was silent on the use of such options. A clarification issued by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) had said that all such options would be considered debt financing. If a foreign party is involved they’d automatically be treated as an external commercial borrowing.

While investors and private equity players continued to insert these clauses in deals the main issue arose when one party refused to honour its end of the bargain. These contracts couldn’t be enforced in court leaving the aggrieved party fuming but without any legal recourse. In 2009, DE Shaw was prevented by the RBI from exercising a put option. It was to have received a 27 percent return on an investment it made in DLF.

With the change in rules such cases won’t recur and it will open up an internally accepted financing practice to Indian companies.

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. the country’s largest consumer goods company reported a strong set of numbers and has, for the time being at least, erased fears of a sharp slowdown in consumer spending.

The company ticked the boxes on all three parameters – revenue growth, profit growth and volume growth. In the quarter ended March 31, HUL reported a profit of Rs.780 crore, an increase of 17 percent with a 60 basis points increase in operating margin. Sales for the quarter were up 12.5 percent to Rs.6367 crore. Volume growth, a key indicator of the health of the business was up 6 percent. While this was lower than previous growth rates it was nowhere as low as the market feared.

Still, the company did acknowledge that it faces a tough operating environment. Two indications of this are the growing volatility in commodity prices and currency fluctuations. That makes planning and forecasting for the future that much harder, according to Nitin Paranjpe, CEO of the Hindustan Unilever. He pointed out that the weekly quantum of fluctuations in some commodity prices are what they would earlier see in a year. There’s also been an increase in advertising and promotion spends to Rs.144 crore up 90 basis points.

While it was business as usual in most categories with growth rates in line with or slightly above the competition HUL also saw a slowdown in discretionary spends by consumers. Skincare and ice creams were two categories that saw reduced spending. Both categories were affected by the shutting down of modern trade stores that contributed to a disproportionate amount of sales. About 300 modern trade stores have closed in the last year.

So what is the company doing to make sure it keeps growing rapidly? For one it is investing in what it terms are categories of the future. These products – conditioners, shower gels, tea bags and so on – now make up Rs.1000 crore in sales. “It is our job to identify these and take steps before it becomes obvious and imperative for others to react,” said Harish Manwani, chairman of HUL and COO of Unilever.

Second, it is powering ahead with trebling its rural direct distribution reach, as part of an initiative it had launched in July 2010. The company has added a million outlets across rural India to its distribution network so far.

HUL’s shares ended the day at Rs 497, a jump of 7 percent. The stock had been under pressure in the last quarter as the company announced an increase in royalty payments to its parent Unilever. The company announced a higher dividend payout at Rs.6 per share. The announcement also lifted stocks of other consumer goods companies. ITC hit a lifetime high at Rs.325/-

manmohan_shetty

Imagica’s journey began four years ago after Shetty sold Adlabs (Image: Vikas Khot)

Gutsy entrepreneurs the world over have used this to justify their audacious and seemingly outsize plans. Manmohan Shetty seems to be no different. He’s betting big on Imagica, the theme park he’s created on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway.

Imagica’s journey began four years ago when Shetty who had sold Adlabs to Anil Ambani was searching for something to do. One question popped up time and again: Why wasn’t there a theme park in India that could rival the scale of Disney or Universal Studios? Disney had seemed to suggest that Indians were not ready as they couldn’t afford the prices Disney would charge? Shetty knew it was a tough ask and he’d have to get everything from the pricing, to the rides and the food right.

Four years and Rs.1650 crore later Shetty stands on a strong wicket. The park, which opens to the public this Thursday is clearly several steps ahead from anything present in India.

First off, Shetty’s made sure that the park divided into six zones has a distinct Indian feel to it. For instance, take music – most of it is from Bollywood except a few pockets like the African restaurant where Zulu music serenades diners. There’s an adrenaline zone with two roller coasters (only one is operational at the moment). There’s a family entertainment zone where rides are based on Mr.India (you’re strapped onto a car and asked to chase Mogambo, the villain) and Ali Baba (you shoot the Chalees Chor and win points for each shot).

There’s also an incredible i for India ride that takes riders on a tour of all India has to offer – from temples to lakes and deserts to the snake boat race. Park staff usher you around from ride to ride with a politeness that is rarely seen in India.

Imagica offers 21 rides (19 are operational at present) that are designed to keep families and children busy through the day.

Shetty says he expects to get between two and three million visitors to the park a year. (1.75 million is what his business needs to break even) He’s based his numbers on careful calculations and says the park will be a draw for visitors from Mumbai, Pune and Nashik – a 40 million strong catchment area. Every monsoon 50,000 families travel from Mumbai to Lonavala. Shetty believes if he can get even half of them to stop at his park, he would have made his numbers. Ticket sales would bring in 70 percent of revenue with merchandising accounting for another five.

roller_coaster

Imagica offers 21 rides (19 are operational at present) that are designed to keep families and children busy through the day (Image: Vikas Khot)

Like all theme parks the world over Imagica expects to make 20 percent of its revenues from food. Five restaurants located around the park have been decked out in various themes. There’s an Africa themed restaurant, an Indian buffet and for those who can’t do without their hamburgers there’s an American diner. A day pass will set you back by Rs.1200 on weekdays and Rs.1500 on weekends – and this is only the introductory price.

So was it as good as Disney? Not quite. For starters, it’s a third of the size of Disneyland. A water park is expected to open next year along with a 300 room hotel. But with the rides and the food and the layout Shetty has got it spot on. Already he says he’s planning his next move with more new rides. As of now there are some rough edges – a part of the landscaping still needs to be done. ‘Nitro’ the largest roller coaster of the park is still a couple of months away. But word of mouth will ensure the park does well this summer. Sustaining it should see Shetty pull out all the marketing tricks in his book.

For middle class Indians, investing in property has been the surest bang for the buck. On an average, property values have quadrupled in the last decade.

But now there are increasing signs that the dream run that real estate has enjoyed over the last decade could be coming to an end. Real estate practitioners point to slowing sales and rising inventories. As this story in The Economic Times explained, there is a glut of independent homes in south Delhi. Around the country, in separate micro-markets, the story is no different.

And so the question: could 2013 be the year when real estate begins to crack?

First, lets start by looking at the last period of low economic growth. Between 1995 and 2002, the Indian economy chugged along at an annual rate of 4.9 percent. Those who’ve been in the business long enough will tell you that real estate prices eased by 2-3 percent a year across large cities. “So by the end of 2002 you had a 20 percent decline but the year-on-year decline was very gradual,” according to a Mumbai-developer who declined to be named.

According to him three years of 5-6 percent growth and the situation could be repeated.

Second, the rise of the professional real estate investor. The last 10 years have seen a growing number of middle class Indians trying their hand at the property market. Their speculative behaviour is not unlike that of middle class Americans who during the go-go years bought houses only to flip them a couple of years later for a 15-20 percent gain. That came crashing down in early 2008 and the rest of the story is well known. It is only now that housing prices in America have started to rise.

India circa 2013 is no different. Dinner parties are filled with casual conversations on which apartment or piece of land to invest in. There’s this sweeping confidence in real estate giving a 20-25 percent return every year. According to Sanjay Dutt, chief executive at Cushman and Wakefield, if a developer sells 2,000 flats and 70 percent of those are to people who plan to put them on the market in a couple of years, those shouldn’t be counted as sales.

This leads to a situation in large metros where houses in under-construction projects are available anywhere between Rs 1,000-1,500 less than what the builder is selling them for. Those who want to sell houses are willing to take a small haircut. What happens when this becomes too acute is not too hard to see. The market would correct.

Lastly, according to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, 11.09 million homes in urban areas are lying empty. Sellers are holding out in the hope that capital values continue to appreciate while buyers find the prices too steep. When that stock comes on stream this could also portend a correction.

For Hindustan Unilever it’s been a rough couple of weeks. India’s largest consumer goods company has been hit by a double whammy – slowing consumer demand and an increase in royalty payments.

It’s no surprise that the markets aren’t pleased. The stock has fallen 8 percent to Rs.452 since its quarterly results announcement on 22 January. So far it shows no signs of recovering.

The step up in royalty payments from 1.4 percent to 3.15 percent of sales has caused considerable heartburn among the investor community. Motilal Oswal, a brokerage expects HUL’s 2014 profits to be 3 percent after factoring in the new royalty payments. In 2015 profits are forecast to be 4.8 percent less. With earnings projections downgraded it was only natural that the stock trend downward to adjust its value. In December Unilever’s Indonesian subsidiary had increased its royalty payout to 5 percent and there had been murmurs about HUL doing the same. So is the markets reaction justified or is it just another instance of the market over reacting?

Let’s take the royalty issue first. At 1.4 percent of sales there’s little doubt that the royalty the company was paying to its parent Unilever was abysmally low. Rival multinationals Nestle and Colgate Pamolive pay 3.4 and 4.4 percent of sales respectively to their global parents. But then these companies were very clearly Indian outposts of their global parents. Unlike HUL which has homegrown brands like Wheel and Lifebuoy they don’t have their own local brands. Their marketing efforts dovetail closely with their global parents’ and supply chain functions as one well-oiled global engine.

Now, HUL had till the late 1990s been largely independent of its global parent. Products were often made for India, sourcing was done locally and marketing campaigns were crafted here.

All that began to change a decade ago as Unilever began to centralize its functions. Marketing campaigns were often crafted in the Singapore regional headquarters. Supply chain was made a global function and arguably the company would have benefited hugely from being able to source large quantities on a global scale. Its research and development center in Bangalore became Unilever’s and HUL got access to Unilever’s innovation pipeline. In exchange for this the company will now have to pony up in excess of 2 percent of its turnover.

Most analysts that Forbes India spoke to say they don’t have a problem with HUL paying more to its parent. Instead they question the manner in which it was done and the timing. Some also said that it wasn’t clear what extra benefits the company would derive from this increase in royalty payment.

Let’s address the timing issue. Clearly, this could have been handled differently. While it would have been impossible for a listed company to have released market moving information selectively it could definitely prepared large investors for a change in royalty rates. (According to at least one analyst the company had called a select group in late December to apprise them of a slowdown in consumption demand. It could have signaled an increase in royalty payments then.)

What also peeved analysts was the lack of a clear rationale for increasing the royalty rates. As Nikhil Vora and Harit Kapoor of IDFC wrote in their report “Not only is the timing and ambiguity of the implementation debatable, but also such an increase caps the margin expansion potential in the next 3 years.” In deciding the quantum of the increase its unclear what parameters the board considered. In an analyst call HUL declined to provide a specific set of parameters that the board considered. Also, the government had liberalized royalty payment rules in 2010. Why did Unilever wait till 2013 to increase royalty? Also why is it being done in a tiered manner? As one analyst asked – if the services that Unilever is providing are worth so much then why not pay the full amount from today? Again, the management sidestepped the issue.

In 2010 when the country’s largest car maker, Maruti Suzuki increased royalty payments to Suzuki Motor Co. and there had been a similar protest by the analyst community. Just like HUL the company had declined to provide a rationale for the quantum of the increase to 5 percent of domestic sales and 8 percent of exports. But in a background chat company officials said that the amount was determined scientifically. They’d even looked at the number of man-hours Indian engineers spent in Suzuki headquarters in Hammamatsu, Japan in developing new models, the quantum of Indian designed components in a car and so on. And Mr. R C Bhargava, chairman, Maruti Suzuki had fought hard to keep the amount under check. But the official view was, “the stock will take a bit of a hit and life will get back to normal.”

In HUL’s case the company seems to have adopted a similar stance. Let the stock fall and life will get back to normal. Except that for HUL there is also a consumption slowdown that it has to contend with. A recent Credit Suisse Indian consumer survey showed that people were increasingly downtrading or buying cheaper consumer goods. Fewer people now want to buy smartphones and more want to buy an entry-level car as opposed to a mid-size automobile. HUL may just trend downwards for a while and that would be sad for a company that has seen a pretty spectacular turnaround in fortunes in the last four years.

Anand Kripalu

Anand Kripalu, president India and south Asia, Mondelez International. Image courtesy: Getty Images

(The blog has been updated to add comments from a company spokesperson.)

Anand Kripalu, the man responsible for Kraft’s businesses in India and south east Asia has had his portfolio reassigned.From January 1, 2013 Kripalu will be responsible for the company’s businesses in India and its neighbours. This comes as Mondelez International, which was recently spun off by Kraft to focus on snacking and high growth emerging markets is reworking its international reporting structure.

Kripalu who joined Cadbury India in 2005 as managing director, India has had his role changed several times. In 2008 he became president Asia for Cadbury. In February 2010 post the Cadbury acquisition by Kraft Foods became president south Asia and Indochina responsible for India, Thailand and Vietnam. In March 2012 Malaysia and Philippines were added to his list of countries.

As part of the current restructuring the company plans to have individual country heads for each of the BRIC markets, according to a company spokesperson. Kripalu’s reassignment is part of that wider change. He continues to report to Pradeep Pant, whose responsibilities have been enhanced to include eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa in addition to the Asia Pacific region that he was responsible for earlier.

The changes come at a time when Mondelez’s Indian subsidiary finds itself the subject of an excise evasion inquiry.Forbes India in an August 2012 storyhad reported how the company went about claiming excise exemptions for a factory in Baddi, Himachal Pradesh even though it was not entitled to them. The matter is still under investigation and the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence is expected to issue a show case notice in January. “The January 1 restructuring and the current excise inquiry are unrelated,” a company spokesperson said in an email.

In November the matter came up for discussion in the Indian parliament and minister of state for finance S S Palanimanickam said that an amount of Rs200 crore was under investigation.

As part of the new structure Mondelez has announced five worldwide regions – Europe; North America; Latin America; Asia Pacific; and Eastern Europe, Middle East & Africa (EEMEA). South east Asia, which earlier reported into three clusters either Japan, India or Asia Pacific will now have its own CEO.

India and China two high growth markets will also handled separately, the company said in an email response. The company says this is being done to sharpen its focus on these markets.

 
 
Samar Srivastava
After studying law I vectored towards journalism by accident and its the only job I've done since.
It's a job that has taken me on a private jet to Jaisalmer - where I wrote India's first feature on fractional ownership of business jets - to the badlands of west UP where India's sugar economy is inextricably new tied to politics.
I'm a big fan of new business models and crafty entrepreneurs. Fortunately for me there are plenty of those in Asia at the moment.
Bouquets and brickbats are welcome at samar.srivastava@network18online.com
 
 
 
Most Popular
Samar Srivastava's Activity Feed
October 04, 2014 14:11 pm by sheetal ahuja
Hey, i hv been a regular shopper at central since around 5 yrs... but some of my recent past shopping experiences had been very depressing.... i have noticed that women's clothing collections are not exclusively and genuinely made and designed for Central... i have ended up paying a good amount whi...
August 21, 2014 19:47 pm by Rakesh
The real growth counted is appreciation less inflation. real estate is the only place that counts the inflation. FDs and all other financial instruments show fake gain, hence the inclination towards Property. Here also Govt. takes the fleece off the middle class investor by charging heavy registrati...
July 30, 2014 19:19 pm by kevan
i have just purchased at tata housing Shubha Griha at ahemdabad and i think its a superb option for second home investment and greener homes.
July 18, 2014 11:19 am by Pankaj Gupta
Very well said Mr Surender Jakhar.
July 09, 2014 19:23 pm by Vikrant Maggu
Surenderji i agree to what you have said and being a developer can very well understand as to what the END Useher feels when he has to pay More from his pocket but sir you have to understand that when a builder has to purchase a plot and has to give cash as the land owner will not sell in full chque...