Follow
UpFront/Special | Feb 8, 2010 | 2898 views

Should India Bat for Tamils in Sri Lanka?

With Tamils in Sri Lanka beaten on all fronts, the time has come for India to intervene decisively
Should India Bat for Tamils in Sri Lanka?
Image: Caballero-Reynolds/Reuters
With Rajapaksa’s re-election, both the Tamils and neighbouring India, which plays an inevitable but a hesitant role in the happenings on the tear-drop island, are at the crossroads

S

omebody once said democracy is the right to choose your dictator. For the minority Tamils in Sri Lanka, the Presidential election in late January presented such a baffling dilemma. Should they vote for the man who ordered a bloody war on their homeland or for the military general who actually led the troops into their fields? In the end, most Tamils stayed home on the poll day unable to fathom who was the lesser evil.

Their paralysis helped the political commander. President Mahinda Rajapaksa, who had gambled by calling a snap election two years ahead of schedule, won a decisive mandate to run the island nation for another six years starting November 2010. The Sinhalese majority rewarded him for vanquishing the once invincible Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a ruthless guerrilla force that led a separatist campaign in the Tamil parts for more than three decades.

With Rajapaksa’s re-election, both the Tamils and neighbouring India, which plays an inevitable but a hesitant role in the happenings on the tear-drop island, are at the crossroads. They now have to shift gears and engage the 64-year-old lawyer-turned-politician to find a solution to the festering Tamil problem.

At the peak of his power now, Rajapaksa has no political compulsion to listen to them. He has defeated the LTTE, won the executive presidency without the Tamil vote and has won international support, overt or tacit, for his military solution. There is, of course, this small matter of a war crime investigation against him, but he can count on countries such as China to veto any move at the United Nations to penalise him.

On the other hand, the Tamils are at their lowest point. With LTTE gone and the moderate Tamil leadership filled with weaklings, they don’t have anybody to send to talk to the President. “The Tamils are confused,” says N. Sathiyamoorthy, director of the Chennai chapter of Observer Research Foundation. “They have very low negotiating power and in fact, nothing to offer.” Rajapaksa has repeatedly asked Tamils to come up with a final solution, which they have been unable to do. For a population trained by LTTE not to think of anything but secession, federal solutions are not easy to grasp.

India stopped playing an overt role in Sri Lanka’s affairs in 1991, when LTTE killed its former prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi. A year earlier, it had also seen the principal adversaries, the Sri Lankan government and LTTE, gang up together to oust India’s peacekeeping force from the island and butcher a peace agreement. Stung by this, India reduced its involvement to occasional behind-the-screen interventions. Rajapaksa’s final war against LTTE did get India’s support, but the latter never wanted to admit it publicly.

But now, the time has come for India to get involved deeply and openly. India is the only country that can broker a credible accord between the Tamils and the Sinhalese. Most observers expect a 1987 accord mediated by Rajiv Gandhi to be revived now.

India may already be making its first moves. In addition to giving hundreds of millions of dollars to rebuild war-ravaged areas, India is also set to open a consulate in the Tamil town of Jaffna. The enhanced diplomatic presence will be crucial in winning the support of Tamils for any solution it may help evolve.

India would also want to play a bigger role for its own strategic reasons. China is quite active in Sri Lanka through infrastructure projects and reconstruction aid. “If we don’t step up our presence, we will lose the race to China,” says Professor V. Suryanarayan, senior research fellow at the Center for Asia Studies.

The only ray of hope for the Tamils is the upcoming Parliamentary elections. Unlike the first-past-the-post system for the Presidency, Sri Lanka follows proportional representation for the Parliament. So, Tamils will get a certain number of seats and maybe a role in the government. The President will still remain all powerful, but may need Tamil support for any constitutional changes.

 

This article appeared in Forbes India Magazine of 19 February, 2010
Like this article? Subscribe to Forbes India
Just give us your mobile number and we will get in touch with you
Post Your Comment
Name
Required
Email Address
Required, will not be published
Comment
All comments are moderated
 
Comment
Ram2009 February 8, 2010
The writer has ignored the fact that there were more than two candidates in the running. Rahul Ghandi's recent statement that every Indian has the right to live in any part of the country should put paid to the argument of those who claimed exclusivity, both in India and Sri Lanka.
Tharind February 8, 2010
Most of this article dwells on the past in order to create pessimism and a sense of hopelessness for the Lankan Tamils, to try and justify Indian involvement. If Tamil moderates are "weaklings" this is only because the Tiger rebels denied the Tamil people the right to vote for them. So the moderates have virtually no constituency, while the radical-left-leaning Tamil National Alliance (TNA) is grossly over-represented due to Tiger rebel interference in voting in Tamil areas in previous General Elections (they currently have 21 seats). The General Elections in April present a rare chance for Tamils to make a political choice without threats of violence/intimidation from the Tiger rebels. To change the constitution, the government needs a 2/3 majority support in parliament (the backing of 150 MPs out of 225). Without Tamil backing for the resolution, the Sinhalese nationalist factions are likely to block the mainstream Sinhalese parties' moves to grant Tamils greater influence in the nation's governance. If the Tamils elect a large number of moderate Tamil MPs who would be prepared to negotiate with the government, rather than return the TNA extremists - who would continue to be hostile, there is no reason why a political solution cannot be achieved between the Sinhalese and the Lankan Tamils without forreign help, but it hinges on how Lankan Tamils vote in April...
Kato February 8, 2010
Interventionalism cost India a prime minister by the hands of the very terror outfit it bread on the shores of India. India needs to support Sri Lanka in its drive for development and reconciliation. Rajapaksa is a visionary and someone who has fought for human rights as a lawyer and a politician. He will ensure rights of all communities. You just have to given him time to achieve this.
 
Most Popular

© Copyright 2012, Forbesindia.com     All Rights Reserved