Follow
FEATURES/Real Issue | Apr 9, 2010 | 20009 views

Why They Won’t Come to Teach You From Harvard

The education crisis in India is much more serious than can be solved by calling in foreign universities
Why They Won’t Come to Teach You From Harvard
Image: Nicole Cappello / Georgia Institute of technology

Think Parthenon’s numbers are out of whack? Listen to Anand Sudarshan, CEO, Manipal Universal Learning. According to him, the minister has spoken about how he wants to send 30 percent of India’s college-going-age kids to college. Sudarshan’s  estimate is that we need 30 million people going into college and higher education. The National Knowledge Commission set up by the government talks about the need for 1,500 universities — India has 350 now — to meet the human resources challenge.
People have always thought India’s biggest challenge was building ports, roads and power plants. The need to have more college educated kids will be a bigger challenge. In 2008, India had approximately 340 million people in the age group 25-50 year olds who did not have a college degree.  According to data from Parthenon, if we don’t speed up adding seats to our college system, this gap will increase to 380 million by 2014. India’s demographic dividend would turn into a deficit instead.

Since foreign universities can’t fill up these numbers, can the government do it? The knowledge commission thinks that at least 50 world class universities can be set over the “medium term”. Here is a reality check. Less than 10 universities have gained global acceptance as world class universities in the last 20-30 years. And it costs at least Rs. 3 lakh per student just to set up a world class university.  If each of these 50 universities enrolls 10,000 students, the government would need to put down Rs. 15,000 crore as capital expenditure and the country will only have extra half a million kids in college; way short of the eight million needed.

Coming Out of the Profit Closet
Here is a thought. Drop the pretense and let people make money off the sector. Allow for-profit institutions to work. Let government institutions (and hallowed abbreviations) like IITs, AIIMS or IIM continue to do the fine job that they are doing. Don’t dilute their brand and stretch them with scaling up targets. They should remain islands of excellence. But allow for-profits to exist alongside. Indians trust for-profits for their health by admitting themselves into an Apollo or Wockhardt hospital. They ride with their families in cars made by for-profits like Tata Motors or Maruti. They fly in airlines run by Indigo and Kingfisher. They drive on roads and bridges built by profit-seeking companies. Why is education, higher or otherwise, in the hands of profit-makers such a dangerous idea?

Countries like US and China have used the for-profits to put large numbers of people through college. The for-profits came up in the 1950s-1960s when students went straight to work after high school and thus, needed continuing education. Universities like University of Phoenix, ITT Technical Institute, DeVry University, Capella Education and Laureate Universities International all have a completely market-driven model based on demand. Research suggests that in the US, for-profits educate 7 percent of the total enrollments in degree-granting institutions each year. University of Phoenix has about 455,000 students today. Both Phoenix and Devry were profitable right through the economic meltdown!

But in India, if you turn into a for-profit,  then you can’t award degree or diplomas. Consider the case of Mumbai Business School. The folks there wanted an independent programme because they wanted to deliver high quality programmes that were contemporary and relevant. The University Grants Commission (UGC) and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) are too sluggish to update and modernise their guidelines, says Sunil Rai, CEO, Mumbai Business School. “For instance, take UGC guidelines for the MCA programme. It still mandates that students be taught Pascal and Fortran that are now outdated. They don’t include things like ERP [enterprise resource planning] that are current,” he says.

Mumbai Business School is structured as a company and not a trust that manages an educational institute. What it gains in profit it loses in recognition. “Only a university under UGC  or a college under AICTE can award degrees and diplomas. And we don’t offer that but there is always the danger that AICTE can put us in the list of non-recognised institutes on their Web site,” says Rai.

Next Article in Real Issue
Like this article? Subscribe to Forbes India
Just give us your mobile number and we will get in touch with you
Post Your Comment
Name
Required
Email Address
Required, will not be published
Comment
All comments are moderated
 
Comment
Raj April 22, 2010
The electricity act, 2003 expedited the setting-up of power generation capacity and it is expected that generation shortfall would be plugged in the next decade.

An act on similar lines in the higher education space might help create capacity in a systematic and predictable manner.
abdul April 20, 2010
There is more to the so called FDI in Education than meets the eye. This is the idea of the US Globalists. In the USA, there is no manufacturing to speak of, the US Corporates having shifted to places offering CHEAP labour. The only ones that Uncle Sam,is concentrating are:-


1.The Military Industrial Complex and War.


2.Wall Street's Financial sector.


3.Bio-Tech and GMO


4.Pharma


This is the reason the US Globalists are interested in FDI in Education.The aims are:-


1.Privatization and running the same using FOUNDATIONS,as is proposed in Detroit.


2.Land Grab


3.Espionage. (Most US Universities,Cos etc,are fronts of the CIA) But the main aim is for brainwashing the youth,for ushering in ONE WORLD TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENT.


There are also many complex and seemingly unconnected reasons, like Gold scams, Depopulation etc.
Rakesh Barve April 14, 2010
Higher education is undergoing a huge change even in the US where the traditional University system is in the process of being disaggregated -- surprisingly this article doesnt mention this aspect at all. Although the likes of Harvard will still continue as they are, a lot of good Universities in the state system have been hit and there is a transformation ongoing -- this is catalyzed by the recession but is independently overdue. In India the authors fail to even mention the severe dearth of quality faculty members to scale -- This is a soft issue aside from regulations and physical infrastructure but very crucial.
Interestingly, some of the solutions emerging in the aforementioned transformation of higher education are related to getting rid of dependency on 'stellar' faculty to deliver high quality courses -- and that may be the solution to the quality faculty problem for higher education in India.
 
Most Popular
© Copyright 2012, Forbesindia.com     All Rights Reserved