W Power 2024

Why is India's Biggest Investment Banker in Exile?

If India's top fund-raiser Nimesh Kampani can be hounded out of the country by a politician, then freedom of business is a mere fallacy

Published: May 18, 2009 07:04:10 AM IST
Updated: Jun 6, 2009 04:09:43 PM IST

Searing heat and a crisis-ridden economy make Dubai a very unattractive place to spend this summer in. Only the most desperate who find their own territory too hot will go there. And now when Indians are celebrating the triumph of democracy through a free and fair election, there is one Indian who has been denied the comfort of freedom on the flimsiest of charges and driven to the unfriendly weather of the emirate. It is indeed an irony that the man in question is one who proved to the world that there can be a successful home-grown investment bank in India — a service to the nation, if you will.

Nimesh Kampani, merchant banker to the mighty, faces arrest in India. The windmills of Indian justice have ground and crushed many innocents, but one would have hardly expected such an influential banker to share their fate. After all, the richest on the land like Ambanis and Tatas are his friends. He is a billionaire himself. The biggest fund-raising deals of recent years have all passed with his signature. The founder of JM Financial is among the most respected businessmen in the country.

Missing in Action?
Image: Sameer Joshi / Fotocorp
Missing in Action?
But today, the state government of Andhra Pradesh is hunting him for a possible arrest in an old case involving a non-banking finance company that defaulted on its public deposits about seven years ago. The regime, which has returned to power in the recent elections, is using Kampani’s temporary association with that company nearly a decade ago as a ruse to corner him. And Kampani is running out of legal options to defend himself from what he believes to be a witch-hunt.

“Nimesh is known to me for 35 years. I consider him to be a great merchant banker, but above all a gentleman,” says Bhupen Dalal, chairman emeritus of Cifco, an investment management company. This pretty much reflects the sentiment with which corporate India has reacted to the Kampani episode. Most of his friends are shocked, but unable to help him out in a craftily built case of cheating that has raised a larger question: How long will business remain a hostage to petty politics?

Kampani’s crime? He was an independent director on the board of Nagarjuna Finance Ltd., headquartered in the scam-smelling city of Hyderabad. In 1999, he resigned from the post and three years later, the company defaulted on repaying deposits worth Rs. 100 crore. It is at best a case in which the police could have sought Kampani’s cooperation to investigate the real actors and causes behind the default. But they went far ahead, using a particularly lethal provision in their depositor protection law to seek his custody.

Neither Nimesh Kampani nor the representatives of the state government spoke for this story. Many emails and faxes to AP officials went unanswered. But insiders who have been following the behind-the-scene manipulations in this case say the motive of the political masters is to injure his reputation and cause him discomfort, rather than solve the Nagarjuna default case. So, a scrutiny of the merits of the case as well as the curious happenings that led to this episode become unavoidable.

Fixing Liability
Dalal points out Kampani had made his exit from the finance company before the defaults began and argues the investment banker is not liable for what happened later. This surely sounds logical, because Kampani couldn’t have caused or avoided the defaults that happened three years after he left.

However, in southern India — where vanishing finance companies are a common occurrence — state governments have armed themselves with wide-ranging powers to arrest anybody involved in the management of such companies, including past and present directors, executive or independent. A look at the relevant provision of the Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments (APPDFE) Act, shows how potent such powers are. The law allows the state to punish “every person responsible for the management of the affairs of the financial establishment… with imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years and with fine.”

While it is possible that fraudsters could mismanage companies and quit them before the beginning of defaults just to evade prosecution, it is also equally true that innocent people could be subjected to a witch-hunt by politicians using such laws. That’s why savvy money managers in Mumbai challenged a similar law in Maharashtra. The Bombay High Court has stayed its operation.
The other question is how far an independent director can be aware of the finances of a company? After all, he would depend on the data furnished by the management. “When provident funds do not get paid, or when auditors give misleading statements, can independent directors be blamed?” asks Hemendra Kothari, another leading investment banker. ”If you want good corporate governance through the participation of independent directors, all such ridiculous laws need to be changed immediately.”
The Nimesh Kampani case has coincided with the biggest scam in corporate India’s history. Satyam. That case, too, has originated in the same city, Hyderabad. That fraud involves more than Rs. 7,000 crore, but till today, the company’s independent directors during Satyam’s fraud years (Harvard University professor Krishna Palepu and venture capitalist Vinod Dham among them) have not been arrested.

The Warning and After
In 1999, the same year as his exit from Nagarjuna Finance, Nimesh Kampani joined hands with Morgan Stanley to offer a bouquet of financial services. The joint ventures quickly became a leading player in India’s market for capital issues and consolidation activity. Two years ago, the alliance ended and Kampani’s operation became an indigenous one.

During this journey, he has helped many business houses raise capital across India. He didn’t realise that one such deal would irritate someone so much that his freedom could be under peril one day. (See box in the next column)

Image: Jason Reed/Reuters
Kampani’s real crime, say those in the know, is that he had dared to finance Ramoji Rao of the Eenadu group. Now, Rajasekhara Reddy, chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, feels some rivalry towards Rao.

In a burst of coincidences, warnings had been going out to people against having any business association with Rao. For instance, one such warning reached the world’s largest private equity firm Blackstone, which was planning to help Rao out of his financial troubles. Blackstone did not pay heed, but the deal was eventually stalled. Kampani, too, got a warning. Like a good investment banker, he stuck with his client and ignored it.

It was then, sources close to Kampani assert, the state government used the depositor protection law to issue a look-out notice for him. Worried he has been targetted personally, Kampani scurried for cover. That is when the sweltering summer of Dubai felt like Alpine comfort.
In exile, Kampani has launched a legal campaign but things haven’t gone well so far. The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the law (it is the state legislators who must change it) and also refused him anticipatory bail.

So, what are Kampani’s options? One would be to return to India and submit to the process of law. It means short-term troubles like being jailed, but he can hope to get exonerated eventually. The other, of course, is to “cool” his heels in Dubai and wait for a positive development. Obviously, Kampani has chosen the latter.
Two reasons are behind the decision. First, there was a chance that the Congress Party could be voted out of power in Andhra Pradesh. Now we know it has not happened. The second, Kampani wanted to give himself time for reconciliation. He would hope that the sweet taste of election victory may have wiped off the bitterness of the past and the politicians in question may be open to negotiate.


AT LOGGER HEADS

Ratan Tata vs. Mamata
Ratan Tata’s standoff with Mamata Banerjee cost Tata Motors Rs. 1,500 crore after it was forced to withdraw the Nano project from West Bengal.

Rajan Pillai vs. Central Government
Facing a 14-year jail-term in Singapore, Rajan
Pillai, former chairman of Britannia Industries, fled to India where he was jailed by the Narasimha Rao regime in 1995. Two days later on July 8, he died.

Naresh Goyal vs. MNS
When Jet fired hundreds of its employees, they sobbed their way into the heart of MNS chief Raj Thackeray. He forced Jet chairman Naresh Goyal to re-hire them.

Lalit Modi vs. Chidambaram
When home minister P. Chidambaram asked IPL commissioner Lalit Modi to re-schedule the second season of IPL, Modi had to move the whole tournament to South Africa.

Albert Brunner vs. Deve Gowda
Former Prime Minister Deve Gowda’s allegations on Infosys led to Narayana Murthy stepping down as chairman of Bangalore International Airport Limited. BIAL CEO Albert Brunner accused Gowda of lacking basic courtesy and backed Murthy to the end.

Mukesh Ambani vs. Maharashtra
Mukesh Ambani’s mega special economic zone project in Navi Mumbai ran into trouble with the Maharashtra revenue department over protection of villagers’ rights before the elder Ambani sorted matters out.

Reliance Retail vs. Mayawati
Mayawati went after Mukesh Ambani’s ambitious plans to kick-start Reliance Retail in Uttar Pradesh and forced him to shut down units, thus ‘safeguarding’ the livelihoods of hundreds of mom-and-pop retail stores.

Sun TV vs. Karunanidhi
M. Karunanidhi crippled the Sun Network — going after their films, TV and cable operations — after an unfavourable article in one of their papers. The real affair was about money. The Maran brothers sweated it out for two years before patching up with the DMK chief.

The Untold Story of a Witch-Hunt
Nimesh Kampani’s troubles are but a chapter in a long campaign against Andhra businessman Ramoji Rao, whose group had come under severe action from the government headed by Rajasekhara Reddy.
Rao’s problems had begun in 2003. Under the local depositor protection law, the government decided to examine all the records of Rao’s Margadarsi Financiers “with a view to protecting the interests of the depositors.” Rao went to court which restrained the state from attaching or freezing the assets of Margadarsi Financiers and its allied companies as long as repayments were being made.

To survive, Rao needed money fast, but help was hard to come by locally. His attempt to get investment from Blackstone was stalled. The finance ministry at last gave a go-ahead, but with a caveat that the proceeds would not be used to pay off existing depositors. Such a condition had seldom been made before.
It was at this stage that Kampani decided to fund Rao. In January 2008, Kampani decided to acquire an undisclosed minority stake in Rao’s Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd (UEL), a newspaper pu­blisher, for Rs. 2,604 crore. Investments into UEL were made through Equator, a US hedge fund. And then, Nimesh Kampani received a warning.

Searing heat and a crisis-ridden economy make Dubai a very unattractive place to spend this summer in. Only the most desperate who find their own territory too hot will go there. And now when Indians are celebrating the triumph of democracy through a free and fair election, there is one Indian who has been denied the comfort of freedom on the flimsiest of charges and driven to the unfriendly weather of the emirate. It is indeed an irony that the man in question is one who proved to the world that there can be a successful home-grown investment bank in India — a service to the nation, if you will.
Nimesh Kampani, merchant banker to the mighty, faces arrest in India. The windmills of Indian justice have ground and crushed many innocents, but one would have hardly expected such an influential banker to share their fate. After all, the richest on the land like Ambanis and Tatas are his friends. He is a billionaire himself. The biggest fund-raising deals of recent years have all passed with his signature. The founder of JM Financial is among the most respected businessmen in the country.

Additional reporting by Dinesh Narayanan and T. Surendar

(This story appears in the 05 June, 2009 issue of Forbes India. To visit our Archives, click here.)

Post Your Comment
Required
Required, will not be published
All comments are moderated
  • Gulshan

    Kudos for bringing to the fore such a painful reality that businesses in India are facing. Recently there has been a huge furore over China being closed for businesses, after what it did with Google and Rio Tinto. I certainly think Forbes can use its reach in international media to highlight the plight of the Indian businesses and the people who have made it possible in our as-yet-young democracy.<br /> <br /> The government is still controlling too much in India, and it's high time we realize that and take some steps to curtail the draconian laws that still exist. The APPDFE Act is, I'm sure, but one of a motley of such acts still being milked by the opportunist leaders of this nation.<br /> <br /> Another recent instance that comes to mind is the sudden witch-hunt that has ensued around IPL, leading to a summary dismissal of Lalit Modi - a man who has been felicitated worldwide for his innovation in making a profitable business out of a totally new kind of sport, in a supposedly already-saturated market. Why all of sudden IPL has come under shadow this time, when it has done the same things as it has been doing in its earlier editions? Except for the scale of things (meaning primarily more money was involved - which, admittedly is lure enough for our ever-hungry politicos), nothing had changed.<br /> <br /> All in all, the government has no business in meddling in businesses, except where a clear-cut case can be made within the ambit of law, for defending the rights of individual public. And in all such cases, it should be made mandatory why a particular individual is being hunted, and what is expected to be gained by arresting him (Mr. Kampani, in this case). Let the AP Govt. state in clear words what is it that they expect to achieve - will the money be recovered, will the reasons for the losses be made known, how and why do they expect someone who left the company three years before the scam broke surface be aware and involved in it. The law is blind, but that does not prevent it from being (expected to be) justifiable.

    on May 10, 2010
  • Raj

    All these white collar knowledge veterans join companies as independent or executive directors and cheats innocent middle class depositors who deposited their hard earned monies.<br /> <br /> There are thousands of such companies for which they have to pay for their sins. Modern denim Ltd, Morepen laboratories, Asia pacific investment trust ltd, Nagarjuna investments and whole lot of others. <br /> <br /> The poor pensions and aged mothers because of their blood thirst for money. Let them pay the price. He is not in prison yar! He is A/C bungalow somewhere. Why do you bother?

    on Oct 4, 2009
  • Dr Sadananda Halageri

    The kind of summary powers that the AP State Government has armed itself with are really absurd. Such powers offer the unscrupulous politicians and the cronies to play dirty games based on their hidden agenda. There is no doubt that gullible investors that regularly lose their hard earned moneys by the wheelings-dealings of the blade companies need to be protected. The problem is when the governments choose to apply their actions on a selective basis. Such tendencies are extremely high in AP. AP Politicians vie with each other to befriend successful businessman- particularly the unethical ones- and benefit from them materially as well as image-wise.<br /> But the AP government needs to know where to draw the line. It should refrain from causing damage to the image of a respected and internationally reputed merchant banker. It should prove the malafide actions of the target, before initiating drastic legal actions.

    on Aug 8, 2009
  • sudhakar

    I am really disappointed by this article. the article is completely biased in favour of a "successful" businessman. I would have appreciated if the article had covered a broader topic like current depositor laws, etc. I am also offended by the usage of terms like " scam - ridden hyderabad"

    on Jul 7, 2009
  • Gowrishankar

    Simply pathetic! Any action taken by the state governments in the southern states seems to need an ulterior motive. Really sad and pathetic !

    on Jun 24, 2009
  • kgbaliga

    This happens all the time in India, our politicians so blatantly and openly abusing the their authority for settling scores, for political vendetta or simply for extortion and blackmail. It is sad that law makers are literally taking law into their hands and still we call ourselves the largest democracy ?

    on May 22, 2009
  • neeti

    what if someday a state govt. decides to protect its people and their monies from market listed companies with share transfer/brokerages at locations within the state. Will all the companies become liable and their promoters then be arrested if there is/was a decline in the share price as compared to price of purchase in primary or secondary markets, of any investor from public? If any co. stops paying dividends at any time ? since the present law of AP govt. is retrospective in nature would it mean that if ever in the history of listing of any co. there had been a loss to any investor (primary or secondary markets) then everyone associated with the company could be hauled in criminal case? after all just one law can enable this, all to protect the gullible public from evil businesses, esp. since neither the government nor the courts seem to recognise something called adverse market conditions and risks associated with conduct of any business.!

    on May 22, 2009