Phaneesh Murthy: The two chairmen came to my office and told me I have to leave today
Image: Mallikarjun Katakol for Forbes India
Q. When did you inform the Chairman about your relationship?
A. Relationship ended a few months ago, I informed the Chairman a few weeks ago, letter was received by the company a few days ago and I was informed yesterday. It was on for a few months. I won’t get into any specifics because it is very likely that this will end up in court.
Q. Was she reporting into you?
Q. Was she hired by you?
Q. Did you interview her?
A. She was interviewed by the CFO, I met her before she joined for the final interview.
Q. How long she was in the company?
A. Close to three years…
Q. What prompted you to talk to the Chairman (about your relationship)?
A. There were a variety of reasons. There were a combination of factors,
Q. What was their reaction like when you informed them?
A. They suggested we appoint an investigator and do an external investigation.
Q. Were you asked to go on leave at that time?
A. I was not in California, I was traveling in Europe at that time.
Q. Did you hear anything in between?
A. I spoke to the investigators, they also spoke to a few other people. And the sense that seemed to be was that there was no evidence of sexual harassment.
Q. So all this while, you continued working, until last evening?
A. That’s right.
Q. What is your read of this whole thing?
A. They say that I have violated the company employee handbook. Which basically says that any relationship between two employees in a company should be reported.
Q. We have talked to many people today and when there is a senior-junior relationship in a company it should be reported. Isn’t it mandatory? Shouldn’t you have done it?
A. I didn’t know about the handbook, I didn’t know about the rule. If I had known about it, I should have done it. If you look through your own employee handbook, there will be lots of rules you won’t know about…
Q. Perhaps, yes…..
A. There are thousands of rules (pauses) had I known, that’s a different issue......
Q. Given your position and what happened at Infosys, somebody like you should have been paying more attention to the rulebook. How could you miss something like this? Weren’t you supposed to be more vigilant?
A. Yeah, you are right, no question about it. I should have been, but I wasn’t.
Q. What did you think would be the outcome when you told the Chairman?
A. Given how corporations think, I expected this to be the outcome.
Q. So you saw this (termination of services) coming?
A. I have been through this, so to that extent, I know what was coming next.
Q. Do you have a lawyer or a legal counsel?
A. Not yet, I was working till yesterday. I will contact my lawyer today.
Q. What happens to the company after this? You were leading the merger with Patni. Have you spoken to the Board about that?
A. They have not asked me for any advice. They have gone ahead and appointed a person. I am assuming they are on top of it.
Q. How did you hear about the termination?
A. The two Chairmen came to my office and informed me. They told me I have to leave today. Once they had appointed a new CEO what am I trying to protect?
Q. What about conversations with your family? Have you had time to do that? Have you prepared them?
A. I did, but I don’t want to talk too much about it.
Q. What are the next steps for you?
A. I don’t know. I have to think, perhaps correct as many mistakes as I can. I don’t know. This all happened quite suddenly.
Q. What about your shares in iGate?
A. I have vested shares and some outstanding.
More articles from this writer
You might also want to read...
- Capgemini acquires IGATE for $4 billion
- Araceli Roiz pregnant with Phaneesh Murthy's child, claim her lawyers
- The Phaneesh Murthy Saga: How the Cookie Crumbled
- Sex and the CEO
- Phaneesh Murthy Is The New Big Boy in Town
Post Your Comment