Follow
FEATURES/Boardroom | Jul 26, 2010 | 77084 views

India's Biggest In Law, Amarchand Mangaldas

Amarchand & Mangaldas, India’s biggest law firm, has all the trappings of a family-run enterprise including sibling rivalry. The Shroff brothers must quickly set their house in order
India's Biggest In Law, Amarchand Mangaldas
Shardul Shroff, managing partner of Amarchand & Mangaldas

I

f I hadn’t done law, I would have been a doctor,” says the quiet and diminutive man sitting on a plush chair at the Mumbai office of Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. (AMSS), the firm that advises the bluest of blue chips in corporate India. In many ways, Cyril Shroff brought medical precision to the practice of law at the family-run firm, one half of which he inherited.


It is Saturday and the ace corporate lawyer is relaxing in a bold red shirt. He talks about the new thing that has him excited. He is helping draft the new Unique Identification (UID) Bill for the government. “Cyril has such a sharp mind. He cuts through complex regulations and he has such a good understanding. He is like a brain surgeon,” says Nandan Nilekani, chairman of UIDAI and one of the co-founders of Infosys.

The firm, jointly run by Cyril in Mumbai and his brother Shardul in New Delhi isn’t just the largest, but is also the most influential law firm in the country. It is reported to be raking in annual revenues to the order of $100 million. It employs over 470 lawyers across five offices. The firm has grown rapidly over the last decade, and it plans to double its size in the next two or three years. It has changed the way Indian law firms operate by pioneering new models in recruitment and partnership. It is the firm of choice for many of India’s top business houses including Reliance Industries, Tata group and ICICI Bank. Amarchand’s lawyers are often present in the most influential boardrooms mapping out the most powerful deals. Its managing partners are regularly involved in framing government policy and regulation. You can see why the firm has a formidable reputation in India and abroad. “The Shroffs have briefed me on many matters, and I find them excellent to work with,” says lawyer-turned-politician P. Chidambaram, union home minister, in an exclusive chat with Forbes India.

Life, it would seem, is perfect for the hoary Amarchand. Except that it isn’t. The problems of India’s family-run firms that grow large are catching up with Amarchand. The Mumbai operations run by Cyril and the Delhi operations run by Shardul have two distinct operating cultures. This means daily operations are not standardised across the firm and the two offices don’t always agree on the future plans.

Some clients say they feel comfortable being advised only by the senior management because of a lack of mature talent at Amarchand. Many lawyers at the firm feel that the family wields too much control over the business and doesn’t share enough of the profits, which in turn is stifling their own career growth.

This problem is exacerbated because foreign law firms have already begun to circle the Indian market. Even though they are not allowed to practice in India, they have formed alliances with local firms and set up liaison offices. Over the last few years Amarchand has lost very senior people to these firms. In three to five years, a full-fledged entry of foreign firms is quite likely and a new generation of domestic firms would have come into their own. In other words, the time for solving the internal issues is now. Otherwise, just like it challenged and beat bigger firms in the past, Amarchand too will be overtaken by the new firms that are either more entrepreneurial or global.

mg_30772_shardul_family_280x210.jpg

Founded by Amarchand Shroff, Cyril’s and Shardul’s grandfather in 1917, the firm made huge leaps in the 1980s and 1990s under Suresh Shroff, the founder’s son. But then, it wasn’t the biggest. The market was dominated by giants such as Mulla & Mulla and Crawford Bayley.

“The deadwood in these firms had started to pile up around then. They were failing to keep up with the times whereas Amarchand had started to enter into new practice areas,” says a former Amarchand partner. Suresh made a number of shrewd moves and weaned business away from his competitors.

The relationship with Reliance Group is just one example of his successes. “Cyril’s father, Suresh, was on our board. He advised my father and helped us start Reliance, and now his son advises me,” says billionaire Mukesh Ambani. “I’ve had the good fortune of growing up with Cyril.”

In 1980, Suresh Shroff sent his elder son, Shardul, who had already qualified with his LLB (till then, Cyril hadn’t), to Delhi. Amarchand had taken over a firm there and that operation wasn’t yet doing well. “I had never appeared in a court [before that]. The day I landed in Delhi, I had 3,000 cases to argue. It was a baptism by fire,” says Shardul.

But it wasn’t until 1994 when Suresh Shroff died, that Shardul and Cyril formally took over the reins of management.

In the preceding years, Suresh Shroff had capitalised on the liberalisation of the Indian economy and expanded the business. ICICI Bank’s K.V. Kamath recalls those days. “They grew and so did we. A whole lot of new institutions got built in this country in the Nineties and Amarchand was there guiding us and holding our hand,” he says. ”Every new business we built we relied on them to provide us that stamp that this is what we could do, and how to do it.”

By the time Cyril took over at Mumbai in 1995, Amarchand had offices in Bangalore and Kolkata (Hyderabad would be added later). While Shardul had fought his way up, Cyril had the benefit of having worked under his father for nearly 14 years. And this perhaps explains the different ways they look at the business. “What I have been through and what he (Cyril) has been through has been a totally different style of functioning,” says Shardul.

Their colleagues didn’t fail to see the distinction. “They are two very different types of people. One fought and maintained the office on his own, and one had the office bequeathed to him. So of course their inter-personal relationships and personalities are different,” says a former partner at Amarchand.

This article appeared in the Forbes India magazine issue of 30 July, 2010
Next Article in Boardroom
Like this article? Subscribe to Forbes India
Just give us your mobile number and we will get in touch with you
Post Your Comment
Name
Required
Email Address
Required, will not be published
Comment
All comments are moderated
 
Comments (5)
Dialus May 24, 2014
It is really great post.Thank you.
Girish Chandra Apr 4, 2013
I had worked with Amarchand at Okhla, New Delhi Office last 4 years' back and found that this Law firm is best. I worked as Executive Secretary in Patent Division and found the environment quite comfortable and satisfactory. Now, again I want job in Amarchand and consequently submitted my resume over their, but there is no response. during my tenure with Amarchand I worked hard and with satisfaction of my peers.
Sandeep Sharma May 3, 2011
This is the best of the world, not only in India.
Empty Cubicle Jul 28, 2010
Considering that there has obviously been a fair amount of input in this article from the Shroffs, Forbes (and of course Shloka Nath, the author of the story) has done a fine job of producing this objective and balanced article.
Despite the various pitfalls of the firm (some of the significant ones have been highlighted in the article), it is undoubtedly one of the best (if not the best) places to go to for (i) sound legal advise, and (ii) learning the art and science of transactional lawyering (especially if one is fresh out of law school).
Sure the pressure is mind boggling and the hours often inhumane but it does teach you to swim in the deep end and stay afloat.

Disclaimer: I worked in the Mumbai office (as part of one of the largest teams within AMSS- in terms of revenue and manpower) as an associate for 4 years. Quit because "80 per cent of the work is done by 20 per cent of the people" - you, smart reader, would have undoubtedly guessed that yours truly was part of the "20 percent"!
AMIT GAURAV Jul 26, 2010
Well, Indian law firms lack professionalism and hardly promotes talent. Their is no steady career in Indian law firms whereas international law firms promote talent and respect individual lawyers. The argument that only 20% get the 100% work done is sham.
In India the legal profession is highly monopolistic and promote cartel as understood in the logic given in opposing foreign law firm.
Most Popular
Insta-Subscribe to
Forbes India Magazine
For hassle free instant subscription, just give your number and email id and our customer care agent will get in touch with you
OR
click here to Subscribe Online