FEATURES/Boardroom | Apr 27, 2010 | 34810 views

Catholic Syrian: God's Own Bank

A community bank in Kerala finds the church, a rival and a tycoon from Thailand all interested in its future
Catholic Syrian: God's Own Bank
Image: Gireesh GV for Forbes India
COME TOMMOROW Iswardas isn't wiilling to open the door of Catholic Syrian Bank to outside investors


he tropical district of Thrissur in the heartland of Kerala has always attracted outsiders. It was here that Christianity and Islam entered India within years of their founding. But sitting right in the middle of this melting pot of cultures and heading a community bank that represents one of India’s oldest Christian denominations, V.P. Iswardas is in no mood to entertain outsiders. “My job is to focus on my customers,” the man who took charge as the managing director of Catholic Syrian Bank (CSB) last December, says. He is in the middle of a multi-pronged battle for the control of this community bank. Backed by little more than the benign presence of Jesus Christ in a portrait in his office, he is trying to ward off takeover attempts and protect the bank’s independence.

But outsiders, sure as hell, are interested in coming in. CSB has built an exclusive franchise in Kerala with total business of Rs.10,000 crore and 363 branches, reaching virtually every nook and corner of the Malayalam country.  For banks and businessmen looking to dominate the financial sector of the state that gets the highest level of foreign remittances in India, it is a tempting buy.

Naturally, there has been no dearth of suitors. Just 80 kilometres from Iswardas’ office sits M. Venugopalan, CEO of Federal Bank. This larger country cousin of CSB has been trying to acquire it for the past two years in a bid to become the dominant bank in Kerala. It bought a 5 percent stake and waited for a larger stake. It found a heaven-sent opportunity when the Reserve Bank of India set a March 31, 2010 deadline for CSB’s largest shareholder, Sura Chansrichawla, to bring down his 24.5 percent stake to less than 10 percent. Here was a shareholder under compulsion to sell and a buyer eager to lap it up. For a while, it almost looked like CSB would become an apple in Federal Bank’s basket.

While further events have put the deal in a knotty situation, names of other Indian businesses and non-banking financial companies constantly crop up as potential acquirers of CSB. Its star-studded shareholders list includes the likes of engineering conglomerate Larsen & Toubro.

Obviously, all this attention irks Iswardas, who wants to retain the bank’s independence and the Catholic Syrian community in Kochi, backed by the church that wants it to retain its community identity. Their answer? To treble the business of the bank to Rs. 30,000 crore in two years, expand its footprint, create a presence in all states in the country and raise money from the market to fuel that growth. Iswardas hopes that this would discourage existing investors from selling out.

While in opposite camps, Iswardas and Venugopalan have one thing in common. Both have to struggle with their respective board of directors that may not always agree with their views. The CSB board will approve a deal at the right price, while Federal Bank’s board won’t allow Venugopalan to pay as much as he was willing to.

As if this wasn’t enough, a three-way stalemate has just emerged showing that the battle for CSB is far from over. Chansrichawla, who was talking to Federal Bank to sell his stake, went ahead and sold it to an entirely new set of investors.

With none of the three sides willing to yield an inch, a game of patience has begun. The big question is, who will blink first.

The Banker That Never Was
Not many in India have heard of Chansrichawla, a media-shy third-generation non-residend Indian based in Thailand. The affable Sikh held 24.5 percent stake in the bank. But given that Indian law doesn’t allow an investor to hold more than 10 percent in a bank, he sold 14.5 percent to 15 investors from India and abroad. This followed the lack of a deal in his talks with Federal Bank.

Here comes the twist. The share transfer is yet to be cleared by CSB’s board. The RBI asked the bank to check if these 15 investors were acting in concert. The apparent implication was that if they belonged to one group, their combined stake would again violate the law.

For Chansrichawla, this was not the way things were supposed to go. He came here in the 1990s, looking at investment opportunities. Banking was high up on Chansrichawla’s priority list. A generation earlier, his family tried to get hold of a bank (Bank of Ayudhia) in Thailand, but failed. As Thai economy became more liberal, it was left to his generation to enter and expand his family’s interest in banking, finance and insurance.

In 1994, CSB seemed to be a good pick, and he bought 36 percent stake from the Syrian Christian community, which originally promoted the bank. However, things were anything but smooth — there were court cases saying he flouted foreign exchange norms and there was stiff resistance from the church.

The 10 percent rule effectively ended his ambition to control a bank in India. He had to give up.

Post Your Comment
Email Address
Required, will not be published
All comments are moderated
Comments (5)
R.S.Rajan May 4, 2010
Further to my comments of May 1st.

In all the above, first casualty in Sept 2008(AGM) was Corporate Governance. Management got merged into ownership before the Bank merger talk surfaced. All the so called major shareholders became directors. Federal Bank pushed in a former employee and another person who is a close associate of Mr. Venugopalan. Mr. Santhana Krishnan ws pushed in by again Federal Bank even when he was a Director of Federal Bank.

PE funds have their nominee who is again the managing director of one of the funds. Two individual large shareholders got into the board themselves. All this was possible because, these people acted as one group. Now these few are selling the Bank in the market. All these are happening in spite of a good set of guidelines issued by RBI. Enforcement of guidelines is not easy as that of any other law in India. All our prayers are with the Bank and its CEO.
MOHAN.S May 2, 2010
A few things are obviously missed out here. It must be noted that it is through Supreme Court's intervention and its order Chawlas got the approval which was pending for a long time after the RBI declined to acknowledge the transfer. Chawlas are not known to manage any business well in their own country and the bank they were having control in Thailand was taken over by the Government. It is largely believed that Santana Krishnan, Venugopalan and Chawlas pushed the merger proposal for their personal interest rather with larger objective of increasing shareholder value at both banks.
R.S.Rajan May 1, 2010
Please add the following after your last line: " But not mentally prepared to."
R.Soundararajan May 1, 2010
A good analysis. Everyone's prayers must be with Iswardas. One point we should note: Majority of the Directors on the Board neither have any in depth idea about the business nor the culture of the Bank. Since the large shareholders dominate the Board, their personal interest in selling their holding at a high price takes prominence over the growth of the Bank. This is the source of the problem for any CEO. In fact Mr. Chansrichawla's representatives (direct and indirect) are more on the Board despite RBI's clear instructions against.
Sibi John Apr 27, 2010
Quite Interesting !
Next Article in Boardroom
Like this article? Subscribe to Forbes India
Just give us your mobile number and we will get in touch with you
Most Popular
Insta-Subscribe to
Forbes India Magazine
For hassle free instant subscription, just give your number and email id and our customer care agent will get in touch with you
click here to Subscribe Online