Follow
FEATURES/Biggest Questions of 2013 | Jan 9, 2013 | 10156 views

Will UID start to deliver?

A lot of infrastructure has to work together for UID to succeed, says Edgar Whitley
Will UID start to deliver?
Image: Getty Images
Digitising databases and changing work processes are complex activities that take time to be done

T

he PMO has announced that the government will start UID-based cash transfers in 51 districts from January 1, 2013, and it will be expanded to 18 states from April 1, 2013. However, given the practical problems involved, as well as the time required to put in place the requisite infrastructure, I expect it will take time before significant benefits are being delivered in the coming year.  Here’s why.

Journalists often ask whether UID is foolproof. First of all, by definition, it is never going to be a perfect process because if you are talking about fingerprints or iris scans, what you are effectively doing is comparing a digital image of the fingerprint or the iris against similar images held on the centralised system. This is difficult to do. What fingerprint matching algorithms do is to look for particular identifying features on the fingerprint like loops and whorls and use 16 to 20 such points of information as the basis for the comparison. That is, the comparison happens not based on the image but this computer-generated template. And while you are unlikely to get a perfect match, you can evaluate the degree of confidence that two templates are the same.

Further practical problems that one can face while using biometrics is that in a population of over a billion, many of whom are manual labourers, you will still get a large number of people—albeit it may be a small percentage—who aren’t able to provide fingerprints because their fingerprints are worn out. Even the UIDAI data reveals that 1.87 percent of their own trial samples were unable to provide fingerprints which were of sufficient quality to enrol. Now 1.87 percent of a billion people becomes quite a significant number! What makes it worse is that the ones losing out are not the frequent flyers or the middle class. They are the ones towards whom most of the benefits are being targeted—the ones who don’t have birth certificates, driving licences.

The other practical problem that one can face—the coriander plant incident in April 2012 (where a UID number was issued to Mr Kothimeer [coriander], in Andhra Pradesh, with a photo of a mobile phone on the card) is an illustration of it—is that even if the technology got better, you’ve still got to ensure that the whole enrolment and verification process is undertaken properly and securely. That means you must have people who check and ensure that the data given is correct. Again, when you are enrolling over a billion people, predominantly in rural areas in a large country, this is a ‘non-trivial problem’.

So there are lots of technical issues about how good the quality of the data collected is, but those aren’t insurmountable. Of course, you can improve processes over time, but when you are talking of a billion people, it has to be done at 0.000001 percent problem rate if you want to avoid tens of thousands of people being affected.

There are also challenges at the verification stage. Because UID is simply a number, the only way to check that it is valid and belongs to the person in front of you is to check the details against the central database. In contrast, credit card companies that use a local check (example, chip-and-pin or signature) can take a risk-based assessment and allow low-value transactions to proceed quickly and only do (slower) checks against the database (example, to see if the card has been reported lost or stolen) for high-value transactions.

This article appeared in the Forbes India magazine issue of 11 January, 2013
Like this article? Subscribe to Forbes India
Just give us your mobile number and we will get in touch with you
Post Your Comment
Name
Required
Email Address
Required, will not be published
Comment
All comments are moderated
 
Comments (3)
Ashok Pai Jan 14, 2013
whats the point of UID ? was it created to ensure than congress remains in power through cash transfer ?
Ram Das Jan 9, 2013
Fear of biometric failure is a red herring.
Dr. Whitley is incorrectly using UIDAI published stats. The number of people without biometric during enrollnent is 0.14%, not 1.87%. This means 0.14% people cannot use biometric for authentication. It was recently reported that Aadhaar numbers were revoked for most of these cases presumably because of fraudulent enrollment. This means that nearly every Aadhaar holder can use biometric authentication.
1.87% number referred to fingerprint authentication in one test. When combined with iris, the number of people who can not authenticate using biometric is nearly zero.
Aadhaar technology works. Question is if bureaucracy is willing to use it.
Response to Ram Das:
Edgar Whitley Mar 8, 2013
My figure of 1.87% came from the report "Role of Biometric Technology in Aadhaar Authentication Authentication Accuracy – Report Date: 27 March 2012

http://uidai.gov.in/images/role_of_biometric_technology_in_aadhaar_authentication_020412.pdf "Finally 1.87% of residents participating in the study were found to
have fingerprint quality not sufficient for fingerprint authentication"

My understanding is that iris is (currently) used in enrollment only (for deduplication purposes) not for authentication purposes.

Edgar
Most Popular
Insta-Subscribe to
Forbes India Magazine
For hassle free instant subscription, just give your number and email id and our customer care agent will get in touch with you
OR
click here to Subscribe Online